Skip to content

Painkiller Addicts in West Virginia Can Sue Negligent Doctors and Pharmacists

Patients who believe their doctors and pharmacists acted negligently in allowing them to become and remain addicted to powerful prescription painkillers and psychoactive have won an important case before the West Virginia Supreme Court. The ruling in Tug Valley Pharmacy et al. v. All Plaintiffs appl

Published:

Patients who believe their doctors and pharmacists acted negligently in allowing them to become and remain addicted to powerful prescription painkillers and psychoactive have won an important case before the West Virginia Supreme Court. The ruling in Tug Valley Pharmacy et al. v. All Plaintiffs applies only in the Mountaineer State, but it could lead to more careful and considered drug prescribing and dispensing across the United States.

http://www.viceland.com/viceblog/46325726oxy.jpg

The case involved dozens of people who claimed that so-called “pill mills” irresponsibly distributed medications such as OxyContin (oxycodone), Lortab (acetaminophen and hydrocodone) and Xanax (alprazolam) without taking proper precautions to prevent harmful outcomes, especially addiction. The opioids and anti-anxiety drugs named in the lawsuit have high risks for abuse and dependence, and each is subject to strict state and federal controls.

The pharmacists and physicians involved had all been investigated for violating rules for prescribing and dispensing controlled substances. Several had admitted to doing so in criminal court pleas. The patients subsequently filed separate and joint civil lawsuits for medical malpractice.

The state Supreme Court ruling allows the claims for damages to go forward by making juries responsible for determining whether the medical practitioners bore principal liability for getting and keeping people addicted. West Virginia civil law recognizes comparative negligence, meaning that victims do not need to be completely blameless in order to hold others accountable for injuries.

Virginia, where my medical malpractice attorney colleagues primarily practice, follows the opposite legal theory of contributory negligence. If a defendant in a Virginia malpractice case can show that a plaintiff played any role in harming him or herself, the defendant can escape liability. For prescription painkiller addicts, demonstrating contributory negligence could be easy.

That difference highlights the importance of the comparative negligence-based ruling in West Virginia. Patients place enormous trust in their doctors and pharmacists. Staying healthy often requires a patient to assume that physicians and other providers are acting only in his or her best interest. Operating a pill mill, a business concerned more with generating profits than with healing, completely betrays that trust. Patients victimized by careless health care practitioners should have the right to call those negligent professionals to account.

EJL

Legal Examiner Staffer

Legal Examiner Staffer

The Legal Examiner and our Affiliate Network strive to be the place you look to for news, context, and more, wherever your life intersects with the law.

All articles
Tags: Legal

More in Legal

See all
Understanding the Four Classifications of Injuries

Understanding the Four Classifications of Injuries

/
A Guide to Common Personal Injury Legal Terms

A Guide to Common Personal Injury Legal Terms

/
Norfolk Personal Injury Lawyers Working for You

Norfolk Personal Injury Lawyers Working for You

/

More from Legal Examiner Staffer

See all

Will the NHTSA Change Its Vehicle Recall Process?

/

Why Are More People Dying on US Roads?

/