Some Statistics on Medical Malpractice
Mark FavaloroMay 30, 2012 10:15 AM
It’s no secret that attorneys get lots of blame for medical costs spiraling out of control. But public perception often doesn’t align with fact. And a recent study of medical malpractice claims that was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine reveals that litigation of medical claims is not to blame for out-of-control health care costs.
The study examined data on medical malpractice cases from all 50 states between 2002 and 2005, analyzing a total of 10,056 malpractice claims that required some level of defense costs. Using this data, the researchers calculated the number of claims that resulted in litigation, and those claims were resolved depending on which medical specialty was involved. They also calculated how long it took to resolve various types of claims.
While litigation is often pointed to as a big fear or source of concern for physicians, the data shows that the frequency of litigated claims doesn’t match those fears: that frequency ranged from 46.7% for anesthesiologists to 62.6% for obstetricians and gynecologists.
In those situations where litigation did occur, 54.1 percent of the cases across all specialties were dismissed by the court. In addition, across all specialties, only 4.5 percent of claims were ultimately decided by a trial verdict, and of those, 79.6 percent were decided in favor of the defendant.
These numbers tell a very different story than public emotion and perception. The fact is that large-scale medical litigation remains relatively rare. Fears of litigation in the first place and the case actually going to the jury in the second place simply aren’t born out in the numbers.
About the Editors: The Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton personal injury law firm, which has offices in Virginia (VA) and North Carolina (NC), edits the injury law blogs Virginia Beach Injuryboard, Norfolk Injuryboard and Northeast North Carolina Injuryboard as pro bono services.